Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 XT

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600 XT

2020Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 158.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Draws 185W instead of 300W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1600 XT

2020

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Radeon HD 2400 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 XT is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 151.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 62.2% higher power demand at 300W vs 185W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 2400 XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (119 vs 116), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 158.4% (1.5 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2400 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Radeon X1600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

AMD

Radeon X1600 XT

The Radeon X1600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 116 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 119 and the Radeon X1600 XT reaches 116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1600 XT). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 XT). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon X1600 XT
G3D Mark Score
119+3%
116
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1536
5120+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS+669%
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2250 MHz+131%
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
96
320+233%
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon X1600 XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 XT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 XT. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1600 XT) — the Radeon X1600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon X1600 XT
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 185W versus the Radeon X1600 XT's 300W — a 47.4% difference. The Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 XT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon X1600 XT
TDP
185W-38%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.6+50%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $79, while the Radeon X1600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 XT was 60.3% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1600 XT) — the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 150% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 XT (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon X1600 XT
MSRP
$79-60%
$199
Performance per Dollar
1.5+150%
0.6
Codename
Tahiti
Navi 21
Release
November 19 2012
October 28 2020
Ranking
#469
#35

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.