GeForce 9300 vs Radeon HD 6310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 186W, a 153W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$60 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌463.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300 instead at 127 vs 122, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.3% (2.4 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300

The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

Feature	GeForce 9300	Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score	127+4%	122
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	192 KB	320 KB+67%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9300	Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce 9300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9300	Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 9300	Radeon HD 6310
TDP	33W-82%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	3.8+443%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 came in at $60, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 16.7% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 9300) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 14.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 9300	Radeon HD 6310
MSRP	$60	$50-17%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	2.4+14%
Codename	GM108	Cayman
Release	March 13 2015	December 1 2011
Ranking	#810	#598

Search GeForce 9300 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.