Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo T9800

2 / 2

1,189

+0.4%

Atom E3827

Celeron B820

Celeron P4505

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

1,184

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T9800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,184 vs 1,189).
❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9800 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-50?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo T9800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T9800

The Core 2 Duo T9800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 2.92 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $530.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T9800 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.92 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9800 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 58.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9800. The Core 2 Duo T9800 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T9800 scores 1,189 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9800.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T9800	Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.92 GHz+82%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.93 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	6 MB+1100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Taylor (2006)
PassMark	1,189	1,184

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T9800 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.