A6-5350M vs Core 2 Duo T9800

A6-5350M vs Core 2 Duo T9800 Performance Spectrum

A6-5350M

2 / 2

1,199

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T9800

2 / 2

1,189

0.0%

Atom E3827

Celeron B820

Celeron P4505

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5350M vs Core 2 Duo T9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5350M vs Core 2 Duo T9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5350M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8450G, while Core 2 Duo T9800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Core 2 Duo T9800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,189 vs 1,199).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5350M better than Core 2 Duo T9800?

Yes. A6-5350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5350M still makes the most sense overall. A6-5350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5350M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5350M vs Core 2 Duo T9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5350M

The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T9800

The Core 2 Duo T9800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 2.92 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $530.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo T9800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.92 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9800 — a 18.1% clock advantage for the A6-5350M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Core 2 Duo T9800's 1,189 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-5350M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5350M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9800.

Feature	A6-5350M	Core 2 Duo T9800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+20%	2.92 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	2.93 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	6 MB+200%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,199	1,189
Geekbench 6 Single	323	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-5350M	Core 2 Duo T9800
Socket	FS1r2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-5350M) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T9800). The A6-5350M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8450G), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M.