Core 2 Duo U7500 vs Core i5-10400F
Core 2 Duo U7500
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo U7500 is positioned at rank #1051 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7500
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+14%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core i5-10400F
Core 2 Duo U7500
The Core 2 Duo U7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 1.06 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $249.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo U7500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.06 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7500 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 120.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.06 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo U7500 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7500 scores 1,116 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 168.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 1,454, a 155.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 320 vs 5,783 (179% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo U7500 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.06 GHz | 4.3 GHz+306% |
| Base Clock | 1.06 GHz | 2.9 GHz+174% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 1,116 | 13,029+1067% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 1,454+708% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 320 | 5,783+1707% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo U7500 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Core 2 Duo U7500 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo U7500) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,945GME (Core 2 Duo U7500) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 128 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo U7500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo U7500 targets Ultra Low Voltage Laptop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Ultra Low Voltage Laptop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo U7500 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($10 vs $102), the Core 2 Duo U7500 is $92 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo U7500 delivers 111.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 13.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7500 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-38% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-90% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6 | 127.7+14% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core i5-10400F
