Core 2 Duo U7700
VS
Athlon X2 340

Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Athlon X2 340

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 340

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7700 is positioned at rank 1203 and the Athlon X2 340 is on rank 462, so the Athlon X2 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7700

#1190
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5753%
#1191
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5669%
#1192
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5204%
#1193
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5180%
#1194
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5133%
#1196
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4957%
#1197
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4753%
#1198
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4745%
#1199
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4618%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
100%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
99%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
99%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
96%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
93%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1212
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
91%
#1215
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
90%
#1216
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
90%
#1217
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 340

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7016%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6629%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4813%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1450%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1149%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1005%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
576%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
568%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
517%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
517%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
498%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
491%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
489%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
484%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
100%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
100%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
100%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
99%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
98%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon X2 340 (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo U7700 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+50%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7700 and Athlon X2 340

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

The Core 2 Duo U7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,335 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo U7700 and Athlon X2 340 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7700 versus 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo U7700 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X2 340 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7700 scores 1,335 against the Athlon X2 340's 1,333 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7700.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
3.6 GHz+171%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
3.2 GHz+141%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (total)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,335
1,333
Geekbench 6 Single
397
Geekbench 6 Multi
549
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo U7700 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon X2 340 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
Socket
P
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo U7700) / AMD-V (Athlon X2 340). Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo U7700 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 340 debuted at $30. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo U7700 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo U7700 delivers 133.5 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 340 — making the Core 2 Duo U7700 the 40.1% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Athlon X2 340
MSRP
$262
$30-89%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
133.5+50%
88.9
Release Date
2006
2012