Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Core 2 Duo U7700
Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7700 is positioned at rank 1203 and the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is on rank 504, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7700
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7700 | Turion 64 X2 TL-58 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Tyler (2007−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo U7700 | Turion 64 X2 TL-58 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7700 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Core 2 Duo U7700
The Core 2 Duo U7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,335 points. Launch price was $249.
Turion 64 X2 TL-58
The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo U7700 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7700 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58. The Core 2 Duo U7700 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7700 scores 1,335 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo U7700 | Turion 64 X2 TL-58 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.33 GHz | 1.9 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,335 | 1,339 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo U7700 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58
