Core 2 Duo U7700
VS
Pentium 3560M

Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Pentium 3560M

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Pentium 3560M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo U7700 is positioned at rank 1203 and the Pentium 3560M is on rank 153, so the Pentium 3560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7700

#1190
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5753%
#1191
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5669%
#1192
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5204%
#1193
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5180%
#1194
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5133%
#1196
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4957%
#1197
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4753%
#1198
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4745%
#1199
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4618%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
100%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
99%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
99%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
96%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
93%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1212
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
91%
#1215
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
90%
#1216
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
90%
#1217
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3560M

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#141
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
327%
#142
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
322%
#143
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
296%
#144
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
295%
#145
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
292%
#147
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
282%
#148
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
270%
#149
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
270%
#150
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
263%
#153
Pentium 3560M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium 3560M (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7700Pentium 3560M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo U7700 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo U7700Pentium 3560M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo U7700 and Pentium 3560M

Intel

Core 2 Duo U7700

The Core 2 Duo U7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,335 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo U7700 and Pentium 3560M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M — a 57.4% clock advantage for the Pentium 3560M (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo U7700 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 3560M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo U7700 scores 1,335 against the Pentium 3560M's 1,345 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium 3560M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo U7700 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Pentium 3560M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz+80%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,335
1,345
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo U7700 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 3560M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo U7700Pentium 3560M
Socket
P
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%