Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs 3015Ce
Core 2 Quad Q6700
3015Ce
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is positioned at rank 1079 and the 3015Ce is on rank 999, so the 3015Ce offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q6700
Performance Per Dollar 3015Ce
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kentsfield (2007) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+25%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q6700 and 3015Ce
Core 2 Quad Q6700
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Kentsfield (2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 8 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $249.
3015Ce
The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the 3015Ce offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 versus 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q6700 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the Kentsfield (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the 3015Ce uses Pollock (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q6700 scores 2,092 against the 3015Ce's 2,099 — a 0.3% lead for the 3015Ce. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs 4 MB on the 3015Ce.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz+16% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+122% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB (total)+700% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Kentsfield (2007) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
| PassMark | 2,092 | 2,099 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the 3015Ce uses FT5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 versus 1600 on the 3015Ce — the 3015Ce supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3015Ce supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) vs 1 (3015Ce). PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) vs 8 (3015Ce) — the 3015Ce offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P45,G45 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) and FP5 (3015Ce).
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FT5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1600+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+52428700% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q6700) vs true (3015Ce). The 3015Ce includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-Core)), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (2-Core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 launched at $530 MSRP, while the 3015Ce debuted at $150. At current prices ($50 vs $40), the 3015Ce is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q6700 delivers 41.8 pts/$ vs 52.5 pts/$ for the 3015Ce — making the 3015Ce the 22.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 3015Ce |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $530 | $150-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.8 | 52.5+26% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q6700 and 3015Ce
