Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Pentium G3460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Pentium G3460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Pentium G3460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q6700

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,092 vs 2,114).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($530 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.

Pentium G3460

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $381 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $530 MSRP).
✅Delivers 259.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $530 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3460 better than Core 2 Quad Q6700?

Yes. Pentium G3460 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3460 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3460 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3460 comes in $381 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $530 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 259.4% better value on MSRP (14.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Pentium G3460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q6700

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Kentsfield (2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 8 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium G3460

The Pentium G3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3460 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G3460 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G3460 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the Kentsfield (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G3460 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q6700 scores 2,092 against the Pentium G3460's 2,114 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G3460. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3460.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q6700	Pentium G3460
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz	3.5 GHz+31%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz	3.5 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB (total)+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Kentsfield (2007)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,092	2,114+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3460 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q6700	Pentium G3460
Socket	LGA775	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q6700) / not specified (Pentium G3460).

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q6700	Pentium G3460
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q6700 was priced at $530, while the Pentium G3460 came in at $149. On launch pricing ($530 vs $149), Pentium G3460 was $381 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q6700 delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G3460 — making the Pentium G3460 the 112.9% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q6700	Pentium G3460
MSRP	$530	$149-72%
Performance per Dollar	3.9	14.2+264%
Release Date	2007	2014

Search Core 2 Quad Q6700 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.