CPU
GPU
Celeron B815
Core 2 Quad Q6700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B815 is positioned at rank 799 and the Core 2 Quad Q6700 is on rank 1079, so the Celeron B815 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B815
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q6700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kentsfield (2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+233%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B815 and Core 2 Quad Q6700
Celeron B815
The Celeron B815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $86.
Core 2 Quad Q6700
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Kentsfield (2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 8 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Celeron B815 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B815 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — a 50.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q6700 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron B815 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses Kentsfield (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B815 scores 2,093 against the Core 2 Quad Q6700's 2,092 — a 0% lead for the Celeron B815. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B815 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q6700.
| Feature | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.67 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8 MB (total)+3100% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| PassMark | 2,093 | 2,092 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron B815 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B815 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — the Celeron B815 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B815 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B815) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) — the Celeron B815 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B815) and P45,G45 (Core 2 Quad Q6700).
| Feature | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron B815 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B815 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B815 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron B815 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 debuted at $530. At current prices ($15 vs $50), the Celeron B815 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B815 delivers 139.5 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — making the Celeron B815 the 107.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron B815 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-84% | $530 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 139.5+234% | 41.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron B815 and Core 2 Quad Q6700
