Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3440T

Intel

Celeron B815

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3440T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2014
Similar parts
·······

Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3440T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3440T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3440T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B815

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium G3440T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,107).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Pentium G3440T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium G3440T

2014

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron B815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3440T better than Celeron B815?
Yes. Pentium G3440T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3440T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3440T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G3440T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G3440T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B815 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G3440T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3440T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron B815

The Celeron B815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium G3440T

The Pentium G3440T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,107 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B815 and Pentium G3440T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron B815 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B815 scores 2,093 against the Pentium G3440T's 2,107 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G3440T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B815 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3440T.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3440T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
2,093
2,107
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B815 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3440T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3440T
Socket
PGA988
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B815) / not specified (Pentium G3440T). The Celeron B815 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G3440T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B815 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B815 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3440T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget