Celeron B815
VS
Xeon X3330

Celeron B815 vs Xeon X3330

Intel

Celeron B815

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B815 is positioned at rank 799 and the Xeon X3330 is on rank 854, so the Celeron B815 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B815

#786
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1205%
#787
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1188%
#788
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1090%
#789
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1085%
#790
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1076%
#792
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1039%
#793
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
996%
#794
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
994%
#795
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
968%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#800
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#802
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#804
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#808
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#809
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#810
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3330

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19774%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3317%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2563%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
100%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
100%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
99%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
97%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
97%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
96%
#854
Xeon X3330
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#856
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#858
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
99%
#860
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
98%
#861
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
98%
#862
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3330 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCeleron B815Xeon X3330
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B815 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($15 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCeleron B815Xeon X3330
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B815 and Xeon X3330

Intel

Celeron B815

The Celeron B815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Xeon X3330

The Xeon X3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,102 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Celeron B815 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B815 scores 2,093 against the Xeon X3330's 2,102 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X3330. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B815 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3330.

FeatureCeleron B815Xeon X3330
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
2,093
2,102
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B815 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3330 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B815Xeon X3330
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B815) / not specified (Xeon X3330). The Celeron B815 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon X3330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B815 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B815 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B815Xeon X3330
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget