Celeron B815
VS
Pentium G3260

Celeron B815 vs Pentium G3260

Intel

Celeron B815

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Pentium G3260

2 Cores2 Thrd53 WW2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B815 is positioned at rank 799 and the Pentium G3260 is on rank 556, so the Pentium G3260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B815

#786
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1205%
#787
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1188%
#788
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1090%
#789
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1085%
#790
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1076%
#792
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1039%
#793
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
996%
#794
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
994%
#795
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
968%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#800
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#802
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#804
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#808
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#809
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#810
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3260

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9429%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6469%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1350%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
773%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
763%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
659%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B815 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium G3260 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron B815Pentium G3260
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B815 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 29% cheaper ($15 vs $21) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron B815Pentium G3260
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+38%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B815 and Pentium G3260

Intel

Celeron B815

The Celeron B815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium G3260

The Pentium G3260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,116 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B815 and Pentium G3260 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron B815 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B815 scores 2,093 against the Pentium G3260's 2,116 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium G3260. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B815 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G3260.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3260
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz+106%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
2,093
2,116+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B815 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3260 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3260
Socket
PGA988
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B815) / not specified (Pentium G3260). The Celeron B815 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G3260 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B815 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B815 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3260
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B815 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium G3260 debuted at $64. At current prices ($15 vs $21), the Celeron B815 is $6 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B815 delivers 139.5 pts/$ vs 100.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G3260 — making the Celeron B815 the 32.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B815Pentium G3260
MSRP
$86
$64-26%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-29%
$21
Performance per Dollar
139.5+38%
100.8
Release Date
2012
2015