Celeron B815 vs Celeron B810

Celeron B815

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron B815

2 / 2

2,093

+0.1%

2,091

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B815 is positioned at rank 799 and the Celeron B810 is on rank 801, so the Celeron B815 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B815

#786

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1205%

#787

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1188%

#788

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1090%

#789

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1085%

#790

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1076%

#792

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1039%

#793

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

996%

#794

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

994%

#795

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

968%

#799

Celeron B815

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

100%

#800

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#802

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

99%

#804

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#808

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#809

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#810

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

98%

#812

Athlon II Neo K345

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B810

#789

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1207%

#790

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1189%

#791

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1092%

#792

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1087%

#793

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1077%

#795

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1040%

#796

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

997%

#797

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

995%

#798

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

969%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#803

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

100%

#805

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#809

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#810

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#811

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

98%

#812

Athlon II Neo K345

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Celeron B815 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Celeron B815	Celeron B810
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($15)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B815 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 83% cheaper ($15 vs $86) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron B815	Celeron B810
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+474%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($15)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron B815 Benchmark Check

Celeron B810 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B815 and Celeron B810

Celeron B815

The Celeron B815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B815 and Celeron B810 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B815 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron B815 scores 2,093 against the Celeron B810's 2,091 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron B815. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron B815	Celeron B810
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,093	2,091

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B815) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810).

Feature	Celeron B815	Celeron B810
Socket	PGA988	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B815) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B815 targets Budget, Celeron B810 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B815 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B815	Celeron B810
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B815 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Celeron B810 debuted at $86. At current prices ($15 vs $86), the Celeron B815 is $71 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B815 delivers 139.5 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the Celeron B810 — making the Celeron B815 the 140.6% better value option.