Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-3130M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q8300

2008

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $46 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-3130M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core 2 Quad Q8300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,917).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Quad Q8300 better than Core i3-3130M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-3130M is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q8300 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Quad Q8300 comes in $46 cheaper on MSRP at $179 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-3130M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.4% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 8.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3130M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3130M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3130M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 scores 1,917 against the Core i3-3130M's 1,906 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3130M.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8300Core i3-3130M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)
256K (per core)+6300%
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,917
1,906
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3130M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8300Core i3-3130M
Socket
LGA775
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300) / true (Core i3-3130M). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8300Core i3-3130M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 was priced at $179, while the Core i3-3130M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($179 vs $225), Core 2 Quad Q8300 was $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q8300 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 8.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-3130M — making the Core 2 Quad Q8300 the 23.3% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q8300Core i3-3130M
MSRP
$179-20%
$225
Performance per Dollar
10.7+26%
8.5
Release Date
2008
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.