
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Core i3-3130M
Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-3130M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core 2 Quad Q8300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,917).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Quad Q8300 better than Core i3-3130M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i3-3130M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q8300
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-3130M
The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3130M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3130M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 scores 1,917 against the Core i3-3130M's 1,906 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3130M.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8300 | Core i3-3130M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,917 | 1,906 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-3130M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8300 | Core i3-3130M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300) / true (Core i3-3130M). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8300 | Core i3-3130M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 was priced at $179, while the Core i3-3130M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($179 vs $225), Core 2 Quad Q8300 was $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q8300 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 8.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-3130M — making the Core 2 Quad Q8300 the 23.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q8300 | Core i3-3130M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-20% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7+26% | 8.5 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














