Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs V-Series V140

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 / 4

1,917

+0.2%

Pentium 3556U

Pentium Dual Core T4400

1,913

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q8300

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while V-Series V140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,913 vs 1,917).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Quad Q8300 better than V-Series V140?

Yes. Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Quad Q8300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Quad Q8300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $179 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

V-Series V140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

V-Series V140

The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8300. The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 scores 1,917 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q8300	V-Series V140
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,917	1,913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.