Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs PRO A6-8570

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs PRO A6-8570 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 / 4

1,917

0.0%

Pentium 3556U

Pentium Dual Core T4400

1,919

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs PRO A6-8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs PRO A6-8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q8300

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,917 vs 1,919).
❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while PRO A6-8570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

PRO A6-8570

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-8570 better than Core 2 Quad Q8300?

Yes. PRO A6-8570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A6-8570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A6-8570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-8570 is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A6-8570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $179 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q8300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs PRO A6-8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

PRO A6-8570

The PRO A6-8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,919 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A6-8570 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-8570 — a 41.3% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A6-8570 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q8300 scores 1,917 against the PRO A6-8570's 1,919 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A6-8570.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q8300	PRO A6-8570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+52%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+300%	1024 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,917	1,919

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the PRO A6-8570 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.