Core 2 Solo SU3500
VS
Pentium 987

Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Pentium 987

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium 987

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is positioned at rank 1195 and the Pentium 987 is on rank 1052, so the Pentium 987 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3500

#1183
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5239%
#1184
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5163%
#1185
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4739%
#1186
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4718%
#1187
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4675%
#1189
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4514%
#1190
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4329%
#1191
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4321%
#1192
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4205%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
100%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
98%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
91%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
91%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
89%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 987

#1040
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2643%
#1041
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2605%
#1042
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2391%
#1043
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2380%
#1044
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2358%
#1046
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2277%
#1047
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2184%
#1048
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2180%
#1049
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2122%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
100%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
100%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
99%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
98%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
97%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
97%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
96%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
95%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
94%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium 987 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500Pentium 987
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 32% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium 987.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3500Pentium 987
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+32%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Pentium 987

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3500

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.

Intel

Pentium 987

The Pentium 987 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,487 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium 987 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium 987 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium 987 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Pentium 987 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium 987 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 scores 1,468 against the Pentium 987's 1,487 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium 987. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 987.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Pentium 987
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.5 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
1.5 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,468
1,487+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 987 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Pentium 987
Socket
BGA956
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Pentium 987 debuted at $134. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Core 2 Solo SU3500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3500 delivers 97.9 pts/$ vs 74.3 pts/$ for the Pentium 987 — making the Core 2 Solo SU3500 the 27.3% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3500Pentium 987
MSRP
$262
$134-49%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-25%
$20
Performance per Dollar
97.9+32%
74.3
Release Date
2009
2013