
Core 2 Solo SU3500

Pentium G860
Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Pentium G860 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Solo SU3500
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 256W, a 253W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,468 vs 1,485).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G860 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G860
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $176 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 208.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Core 2 Solo SU3500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 256W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G860 better than Core 2 Solo SU3500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Solo SU3500
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.

Pentium G860
The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G860 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G860 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 72.7% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 scores 1,468 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium G860. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3 GHz+114% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz+131% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 256K (per core)+8433% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,468 | 1,485+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Solo SU3500) / VT-x (Pentium G860). The Pentium G860 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Solo SU3500 was priced at $262, while the Pentium G860 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($262 vs $86), Pentium G860 was $176 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3500 delivers 5.6 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G860 — making the Pentium G860 the 102% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3500 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262 | $86-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 17.3+209% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














