A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Solo SU3500 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-7300B

2 / 2

1,458

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Solo SU3500

1 / 1

1,468

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Solo SU3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Solo SU3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7300B

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8470D, while Core 2 Solo SU3500 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Solo SU3500.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,458 vs 1,468).
❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.

Core 2 Solo SU3500

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while A4 PRO-7300B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-7300B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7300B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Solo SU3500 better than A4 PRO-7300B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4 PRO-7300B is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3500 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Solo SU3500 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Solo SU3500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $262 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4 PRO-7300B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-7300B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Solo SU3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7300B

The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Solo SU3500

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 5.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,468 points. Launch price was $262.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-7300B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4 PRO-7300B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B versus 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3500 — a 96.3% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A4 PRO-7300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7300B scores 1,458 against the Core 2 Solo SU3500's 1,468 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3500.

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Core 2 Solo SU3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	4 GHz+186%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+192%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	3 MB+200%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,458	1,468
Geekbench 6 Single	375	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Core 2 Solo SU3500
Socket	FM2	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B) / not specified (Core 2 Solo SU3500). The A4 PRO-7300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Core 2 Solo SU3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250.