A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron N4000

A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron N4000 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-7300B

2 / 2

1,458

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4000

2 / 2

1,472

+1.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron N4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron N4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7300B

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8470D, while Celeron N4000 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N4000.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,458 vs 1,472).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Celeron N4000

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A4 PRO-7300B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-7300B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7300B.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000 better than A4 PRO-7300B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4 PRO-7300B is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000 is the better buy right now. Celeron N4000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4 PRO-7300B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron N4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7300B

The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N4000

The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron N4000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A4 PRO-7300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4000 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7300B scores 1,458 against the Celeron N4000's 1,472 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N4000.

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Celeron N4000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz+54%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+245%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	4 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark	1,458	1,472
Geekbench 6 Single	375	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4000 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Celeron N4000
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B) / not specified (Celeron N4000). The A4 PRO-7300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Celeron N4000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250.