A4 PRO-7300B
VS
Core i7-620LM

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i7-620LM

AMD

A4 PRO-7300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4 PRO-7300B is positioned at rank 607 and the Core i7-620LM is on rank 1208, so the A4 PRO-7300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4 PRO-7300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10690%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10101%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7334%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2209%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1750%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1531%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
877%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
865%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
788%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
788%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
779%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
758%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
747%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
744%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
738%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
99%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
98%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
97%
#607
A4 PRO-7300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
99%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
97%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
97%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
97%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620LM

#1196
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6012%
#1197
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5924%
#1198
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5439%
#1199
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5414%
#1200
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5364%
#1202
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5180%
#1203
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4967%
#1204
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4959%
#1205
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4826%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
100%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
85%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-620LM delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A4 PRO-7300B in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA4 PRO-7300BCore i7-620LM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4 PRO-7300BCore i7-620LM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4 PRO-7300B and Core i7-620LM

AMD

A4 PRO-7300B

The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-7300B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4 PRO-7300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7300B scores 1,458 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-620LM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 375 vs 450, a 18.2% lead for the Core i7-620LM that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4 PRO-7300BCore i7-620LM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+90%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,458
1,463
Geekbench 6 Single
375
450+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A4 PRO-7300B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7300B) and QM57,HM55 (Core i7-620LM).

FeatureA4 PRO-7300BCore i7-620LM
Socket
FM2
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8470D (A4 PRO-7300B) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i7-620LM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop, Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250; Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureA4 PRO-7300BCore i7-620LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Business Desktop
Budget