
A4 PRO-7300B

Core 2 Duo T8300
A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Duo T8300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4 PRO-7300B
2014Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8470D, while Core 2 Duo T8300 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T8300.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (375 vs 450).
- βLower PassMark (1,458 vs 1,472).
- β2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Core 2 Duo T8300
2008Why buy it
- β +20% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-7300B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7300B.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T8300 better than A4 PRO-7300B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4 PRO-7300B vs Core 2 Duo T8300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7300B
The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013β2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo T8300
The Core 2 Duo T8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $241.
Processing Power
Both the A4 PRO-7300B and Core 2 Duo T8300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8300 β a 50% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4 PRO-7300B uses the Richland (2013β2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses Penryn (2008β2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7300B scores 1,458 against the Core 2 Duo T8300's 1,472 β a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 375 vs 450, a 18.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4 PRO-7300B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+67% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013β2014) | Penryn (2008β2011) |
| PassMark | 1,458 | 1,472 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 375 | 450+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 850 |
Memory & Platform
The A4 PRO-7300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-7300B versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T8300 β the A4 PRO-7300B supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4 PRO-7300B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4 PRO-7300B) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T8300) β the A4 PRO-7300B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7300B) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8300).
| Feature | A4 PRO-7300B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+100% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8300). The A4 PRO-7300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Core 2 Duo T8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop, Core 2 Duo T8300 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250.
| Feature | A4 PRO-7300B | Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8470D | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Business Desktop | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















