Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core 3 100HL

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $110 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • Delivers 122.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 3 100HL?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 42.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $110 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 122.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 3 100HL vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 34.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
8 / 12
10 / 16+25%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
17,586
25,029+42%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 3 100HL was priced at $306, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($306 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 75.9% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 100HLCore i5-13400F
MSRP
$306
$196-36%
Performance per Dollar
57.5
127.7+122%
Release Date
2024
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.