PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 3 100HL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
33.7% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$306 MSRP
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 3 100HL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
33.7% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$306 MSRP
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core 3 100HL?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 160.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 160.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 33.7% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 94.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 100HL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 3 100HL Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	177 FPS	284 FPS
medium	144 FPS	268 FPS
high	119 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	238 FPS
medium	114 FPS	200 FPS
high	94 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	159 FPS
medium	68 FPS	134 FPS
high	54 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Core i7-13700K

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	201 FPS	689 FPS
medium	171 FPS	580 FPS
high	155 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	177 FPS	595 FPS
medium	155 FPS	525 FPS
high	143 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	138 FPS	348 FPS
medium	125 FPS	314 FPS
high	118 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Core i7-13700K

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	440 FPS	648 FPS
medium	440 FPS	530 FPS
high	440 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	440 FPS	591 FPS
medium	440 FPS	491 FPS
high	440 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	387 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	439 FPS	434 FPS
medium	350 FPS	374 FPS
high	312 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	290 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Core i7-13700K

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	440 FPS	970 FPS
medium	440 FPS	883 FPS
high	440 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	440 FPS	829 FPS
medium	440 FPS	740 FPS
high	440 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	440 FPS	567 FPS
medium	440 FPS	515 FPS
high	440 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core 3 100HL Open Core i7-13700K

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100HL and Core i7-13700K

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 89% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	16 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+62%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark	17,586	45,784+160%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,980

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 3 100HL requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Core i7-13700K
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 100HL launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($306 vs $409), the Core 3 100HL is $103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 64.3% better value option.