Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-2683 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-2683 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-2683 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $306 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,459 vs 17,586).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 3 100HL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 100HL better than Xeon E5-2683 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2683 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 3 100HL is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 3 100HL is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 100HL is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 100HL is the better buy right now. Core 3 100HL comes in at an unclear MSRP at $306 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 12 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-2683 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Xeon E5-2683 v4's 17,459 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 3 100HL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+53%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	40 MB+233%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	4 MB+100%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,586	17,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40