
Core 3 100HL

Xeon W-11855M
Core 3 100HL vs Xeon W-11855M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 3 100HL vs Xeon W-11855M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 3 100HL vs Xeon W-11855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 3 100HL
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11855M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 17,586).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core 3 100HL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 3 100HL better than Xeon W-11855M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100HL vs Xeon W-11855M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 100HL
The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-11855M
The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 3 100HL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.
| Feature | Core 3 100HL | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,586 | 17,462 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 100HL | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 3 100HL was priced at $306, while the Xeon W-11855M came in at $450. On launch pricing ($306 vs $450), Core 3 100HL was $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Core 3 100HL the 38.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 3 100HL | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $306-32% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.5+48% | 38.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















