Core 3 N350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Core 3 N350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U Performance Spectrum

Core 3 N350

8 / 8

7,249

+0.3%

7,224

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N350

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 7W instead of 15W, a 8W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,224 vs 7,249).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 7W.
❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Core 3 N350 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 N350 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 N350 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core 3 N350 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 N350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 N350 is the better buy right now. Core 3 N350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 N350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FP5, 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N350

The Core 3 N350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 7,249 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,224 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 N350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 3 N350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N350 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N350 scores 7,249 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U's 7,224 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 3 N350. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N350 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

Feature	Core 3 N350	Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+2200%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	7,249	7,224

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N350 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.