Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 5 225U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 5 225U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 5 225U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 5 210H

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌221.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 14W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 225U

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 14W instead of 45W, a 31W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core 5 210H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,602).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Core 5 210H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 225U is ahead with a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 210H pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 210H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225U still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 5 225U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 5 225U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Core Ultra 5 225U

The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Core Ultra 5 225U's 18,434 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 5 210H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U.

Feature	Core 5 210H	Core Ultra 5 225U
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	12 / 14+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-U (2025)
PassMark	18,602	18,434
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,374
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,846

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 5 210H	Core Ultra 5 225U
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 210H) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Core 5 210H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.