Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Intel

Core 5 210H

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.25 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 210H

2024

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V2748

2020

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,602).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
    • Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core 5 210H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core 5 210H better than Ryzen Embedded V2748?
    Yes. Core 5 210H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core 5 210H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 210H is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core 5 210H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core 5 210H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V2748 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core 5 210H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    1080p
    low275 FPS181 FPS
    medium246 FPS147 FPS
    high207 FPS121 FPS
    ultra178 FPS95 FPS
    1440p
    low230 FPS152 FPS
    medium185 FPS122 FPS
    high152 FPS98 FPS
    ultra133 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low160 FPS69 FPS
    medium130 FPS59 FPS
    high100 FPS46 FPS
    ultra88 FPS37 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    1080p
    low214 FPS369 FPS
    medium177 FPS319 FPS
    high160 FPS281 FPS
    ultra141 FPS246 FPS
    1440p
    low182 FPS320 FPS
    medium156 FPS285 FPS
    high144 FPS255 FPS
    ultra123 FPS219 FPS
    4K
    low142 FPS260 FPS
    medium125 FPS240 FPS
    high118 FPS216 FPS
    ultra102 FPS190 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    1080p
    low465 FPS461 FPS
    medium465 FPS461 FPS
    high465 FPS461 FPS
    ultra465 FPS461 FPS
    1440p
    low465 FPS461 FPS
    medium465 FPS461 FPS
    high465 FPS461 FPS
    ultra465 FPS407 FPS
    4K
    low465 FPS453 FPS
    medium461 FPS372 FPS
    high404 FPS333 FPS
    ultra336 FPS270 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    1080p
    low465 FPS461 FPS
    medium465 FPS461 FPS
    high465 FPS461 FPS
    ultra465 FPS461 FPS
    1440p
    low465 FPS461 FPS
    medium465 FPS461 FPS
    high465 FPS461 FPS
    ultra465 FPS461 FPS
    4K
    low465 FPS461 FPS
    medium465 FPS444 FPS
    high465 FPS397 FPS
    ultra427 FPS335 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 210H and Ryzen Embedded V2748

    Intel

    Core 5 210H

    The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

    AMD

    Ryzen Embedded V2748

    The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 210H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 5 210H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2748.

    FeatureCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 12
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz+13%
    4.25 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.9 GHz+32%
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)+50%
    8 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+300%
    512K (per core)
    Process
    10 nm
    7 nm-30%
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
    Renoir (2020−2023)
    PassMark
    18,602
    18,434
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 5 210HRyzen Embedded V2748
    Socket
    FCBGA1744
    FP6
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0