Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Performance Spectrum

Core 5 210H

8 / 12

18,602

+0.9%

Core i7-9750HF

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

18,434

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 5 210H

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V2748

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,602).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core 5 210H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 210H better than Ryzen Embedded V2748?

Yes. Core 5 210H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 5 210H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 210H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 5 210H is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 5 210H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V2748 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 5 210H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Ryzen Embedded V2748

The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 210H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 5 210H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2748.

Feature	Core 5 210H	Ryzen Embedded V2748
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+13%	4.25 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	10 nm	7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	18,602	18,434

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.