Core Duo T2050
Opteron 250
Core Duo T2050 vs Opteron 250 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Duo T2050 vs Opteron 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Call of Duty: Warzone
Core Duo T2050 vs Opteron 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Duo T2050
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 89W, a 87W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 250 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (585 vs 620).
Opteron 250
2004Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌4350% higher power demand at 89W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 250 better than Core Duo T2050?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Duo T2050 vs Opteron 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Duo T2050
The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.
Opteron 250
The Opteron 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2050 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 250 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core Duo T2050 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 250 — a 40% clock advantage for the Opteron 250. The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Opteron 250 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Opteron 250's 620 — a 5.8% lead for the Opteron 250. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Duo T2050 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 585 | 620+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 250 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Duo T2050 | Opteron 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Duo T2050 and Opteron 250
