Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150

Intel

Core Duo T2050

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 150

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Duo T2050

2005

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 150

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Duo T2050 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (579 vs 585).
    • 2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Duo T2050 better than Sempron 150?
    Yes. Core Duo T2050 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Duo T2050 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2050 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Duo T2050 still makes the most sense overall. Core Duo T2050 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core Duo T2050

    The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

    AMD

    Sempron 150

    The Sempron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 579 points. Launch price was $73.

    Processing Power

    The Core Duo T2050 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 150 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core Duo T2050 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 2.9 GHz on the Sempron 150 — a 57.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 150 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 150 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Sempron 150's 579 — a 1% lead for the Core Duo T2050. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore Duo T2050Sempron 150
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.9 GHz+81%
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.9 GHz+81%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    45 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Yonah (2005−2006)
    Sargas (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    585+1%
    579
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 150 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore Duo T2050Sempron 150
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%