
Core Duo T2050

Sempron 150
Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Duo T2050
2005Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Sempron 150
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Duo T2050 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (579 vs 585).
- ❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Duo T2050 better than Sempron 150?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2050
The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron 150
The Sempron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 579 points. Launch price was $73.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2050 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 150 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core Duo T2050 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 2.9 GHz on the Sempron 150 — a 57.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 150 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 150 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Sempron 150's 579 — a 1% lead for the Core Duo T2050. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Duo T2050 | Sempron 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz+81% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Sargas (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 585+1% | 579 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 150 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Duo T2050 | Sempron 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















