Core Duo T2050 vs Turion 64 ML-40

Core Duo T2050 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Performance Spectrum

Core Duo T2050

2 / 2

585

0.0%

600

+2.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Duo T2050 vs Turion 64 ML-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Duo T2050 vs Turion 64 ML-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Duo T2050

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (585 vs 600).
❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Turion 64 ML-40

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-40 better than Core Duo T2050?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 ML-40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-40 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 ML-40 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Duo T2050 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2050

The Core Duo T2050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion 64 ML-40

The Turion 64 ML-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2050 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-40 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core Duo T2050 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core Duo T2050 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-40 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-40. The Core Duo T2050 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2050 scores 585 against the Turion 64 ML-40's 600 — a 2.5% lead for the Turion 64 ML-40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Duo T2050	Turion 64 ML-40
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	585	600+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2050 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.