Core Duo T2500
VS
Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Core Duo T2500 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Intel

Core Duo T2500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2500 is positioned at rank 943 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is on rank 549, so the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2500

#931
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1756%
#932
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1730%
#933
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1588%
#934
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1581%
#935
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1567%
#937
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1513%
#938
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1451%
#939
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1448%
#940
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1409%
#943
Core Duo T2500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1500

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#537
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
722%
#538
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
712%
#539
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
653%
#540
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
650%
#541
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
644%
#543
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
622%
#544
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
597%
#545
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
596%
#546
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
580%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Duo T2500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Duo T2500Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($49)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Duo T2500Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($49)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Intel

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 versus 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2500. The Core Duo T2500 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2500 scores 1,621 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1500's 1,625 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz+7%
1.87 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,621
1,625
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Socket
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2500) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500). Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
No
Target Use
Mobile
Budget