Core Duo T2500
VS
Core i3-550

Core Duo T2500 vs Core i3-550

Intel

Core Duo T2500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2500 is positioned at rank 943 and the Core i3-550 is on rank 965, so the Core Duo T2500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2500

#931
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1756%
#932
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1730%
#933
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1588%
#934
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1581%
#935
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1567%
#937
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1513%
#938
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1451%
#939
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1448%
#940
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1409%
#943
Core Duo T2500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-550 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Duo T2500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Duo T2500Core i3-550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Duo T2500Core i3-550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2500 and Core i3-550

Intel

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-550's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-550 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Duo T2500 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-550 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2500 scores 1,621 against the Core i3-550's 1,632 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-550. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2500 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-550.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Core i3-550
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,621
1,632
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
437
Geekbench 6 Multi
899
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-550 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-550 — the Core i3-550 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-550 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core Duo T2500) vs 16 (Core i3-550) — the Core i3-550 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Core i3-550
Socket
PGA478
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2500) vs Yes (Core i3-550). The Core i3-550 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core Duo T2500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Core i3-550
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes
Target Use
Mobile