Core Duo T2500 vs Pentium 967

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Duo T2500 vs Pentium 967 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Duo T2500 vs Pentium 967: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Duo T2500

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,621 vs 1,640).

Pentium 967

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Core Duo T2500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 967 better than Core Duo T2500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Duo T2500 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 967 is the better buy right now. Pentium 967 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Duo T2500 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 967 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Duo T2500 vs Pentium 967 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2500 and Pentium 967 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2500 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core Duo T2500 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 967 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2500 scores 1,621 against the Pentium 967's 1,640 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium 967. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967.

Feature	Core Duo T2500	Pentium 967
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,621	1,640+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 967 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.