Core Duo T2500
VS
Ryzen 5 5600

Core Duo T2500 vs Ryzen 5 5600

Intel

Core Duo T2500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core Duo T2500 is positioned at rank #943 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2500

#931
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1756%
#932
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1730%
#933
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1588%
#934
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1581%
#935
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1567%
#937
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1513%
#938
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1451%
#939
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1448%
#940
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1409%
#943
Core Duo T2500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 5600

#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
135%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
123%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
123%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
118%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
116%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
116%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
115%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
112%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
110%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
109%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
108%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
107%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
103%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
101%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
100%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
100%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
98%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
97%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
97%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
97%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
95%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
95%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
94%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
93%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
93%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
93%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
90%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
88%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
87%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 5600 (2022) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Duo T2500Ryzen 5 5600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2500 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Duo T2500Ryzen 5 5600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2500 and Ryzen 5 5600

Intel

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 75% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Duo T2500 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2500 scores 1,621 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 172% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2500 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Ryzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
4.4 GHz+120%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
0 kB
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
65 nm
7 nm-89%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
1,621
21,550+1229%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2500 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core Duo T2500) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Ryzen 5 5600
Socket
PGA478
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 4.0+264%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2500) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore Duo T2500Ryzen 5 5600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Desktop