Core i3-10300 vs Core i7-1068NG7

Intel

Core i3-10300

4 Cores8 Thrd62 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-1068NG7

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Core i3-10300 vs Core i7-1068NG7 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10300 vs Core i7-1068NG7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10300 vs Core i7-1068NG7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10300

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 121.4% higher power demand at 62W vs 28W.

Core i7-1068NG7

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 62W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (9,240 vs 9,290).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10300 better than Core i7-1068NG7?
Yes. Core i3-10300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10300 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10300 vs Core i7-1068NG7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10300

The Core i3-10300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,290 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-1068NG7

The Core i7-1068NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 9,240 points. Launch price was $320.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10300 and Core i7-1068NG7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10300 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068NG7 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-10300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-10300 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1068NG7 uses Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10300 scores 9,290 against the Core i7-1068NG7's 9,240 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-10300. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-10300Core i7-1068NG7
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+7%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+61%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Ice Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
9,290
9,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10300 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1068NG7 uses FCBGA1344 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10300Core i7-1068NG7
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA1344
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0