
Core i3-10300T

Opteron 6348
Core i3-10300T vs Opteron 6348 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10300T vs Opteron 6348 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10300T vs Opteron 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10300T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $418 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 267.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Opteron 6348
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,879).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 50.2 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10300T better than Opteron 6348?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10300T vs Opteron 6348 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10300T
The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6348
The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10300T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6348 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-10300T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Opteron 6348 is built on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10300T scores 7,879 against the Opteron 6348's 7,850 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-10300T. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 12 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,879 | 7,850 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,313 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,090 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10300T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6348 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T) / not specified (Opteron 6348). The Core i3-10300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6348 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10300T was priced at $157, while the Opteron 6348 came in at $575. On launch pricing ($157 vs $575), Core i3-10300T was $418 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10300T delivers 50.2 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Opteron 6348 — making the Core i3-10300T the 114.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $157-73% | $575 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+266% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















