Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H

Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10300T

4 / 8

7,879

0.0%

7,990

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10300T

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,879 vs 7,990).
❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 3750H

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3750H better than Core i3-10300T?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3750H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3750H is still the better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 3750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $157 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,879 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10300T

The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 3750H

The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 7 3750H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3750H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3750H is built on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10300T scores 7,879 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3750H. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.

Feature	Core i3-10300T	Ryzen 7 3750H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz+30%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	—	Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
PassMark	7,879	7,990+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,313	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,090	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10300T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10300T	Ryzen 7 3750H
Socket	LGA1200	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i3-10300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU.