
Core i3-10300T

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10300T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,787 vs 7,879).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 50.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10300T better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10300T
The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,787 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10300T (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is built on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10300T scores 7,879 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE's 7,787 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-10300T. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,879+1% | 7,787 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,313 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,090 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10300T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE). The Core i3-10300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10300T was priced at $157, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE came in at $169. On launch pricing ($157 vs $169), Core i3-10300T was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10300T delivers 50.2 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE — making the Core i3-10300T the 8.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $157-7% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+9% | 46.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















