Core i3-10305T vs Core i5-1140G7

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10305T vs Core i5-1140G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10305T vs Core i5-1140G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10305T

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1140G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $143 MSRP, while Core i5-1140G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌600% higher power demand at 35W vs 5W.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,471 vs 8,512).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10305T better than Core i5-1140G7?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-1140G7 is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10305T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10305T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10305T is the better buy right now. Core i3-10305T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $143 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-1140G7 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (59.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10305T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10305T vs Core i5-1140G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10305T

The Core i3-10305T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,512 points. Launch price was $143.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10305T and Core i5-1140G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-10305T versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-10305T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-1140G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i3-10305T scores 8,512 against the Core i5-1140G7's 8,471 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-10305T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305T vs 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7.

Feature	Core i3-10305T	Core i5-1140G7
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	5 MB+1900%
Process	14 nm	10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)
PassMark	8,512	8,471

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10305T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-1140G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.