Core i3-10305T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Intel

Core i3-10305T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Core i3-10305T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10305T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10305T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10305T

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $50 less on MSRP ($143 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 34.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.5 vs 44.2 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (8,512 vs 8,527).

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.2 vs 59.5 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G better than Core i3-10305T?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10305T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G comes in 35.0% more expensive on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $143 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10305T is also 34.7% better value on MSRP (59.5 vs 44.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i3-10305T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10305T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10305T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10305T

The Core i3-10305T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,512 points. Launch price was $143.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10305T and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-10305T versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β€” a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-10305T (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-10305T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10305T scores 8,512 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 β€” a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

FeatureCore i3-10305TRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+3%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-R (2021)
Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019)
PassMark
8,512
8,527
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10305T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10305TRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10305T was priced at $143, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($143 vs $193), Core i3-10305T was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10305T delivers 59.5 pts/$ vs 44.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β€” making the Core i3-10305T the 29.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10305TRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP
$143-26%
$193
Performance per Dollar
59.5+35%
44.2
Release Date
2021
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.