Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E-2324G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E-2324G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E-2324G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10325

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,291 vs 10,339).
❌Launch MSRP is still $154 MSRP, while Xeon E-2324G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2324G

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10325 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2324G better than Core i3-10325?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2324G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10325 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2324G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2324G is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10325 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2324G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $154 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-10325 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 30.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10325 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2324G is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E-2324G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10325

The Core i3-10325 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,291 points. Launch price was $154.

Xeon E-2324G

The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10325 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2324G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-10325 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-10325 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-10325 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2324G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10325 scores 10,291 against the Xeon E-2324G's 10,339 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E-2324G. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon E-2324G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+2%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+26%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	10,291	10,339