Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10325

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,705 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $2,859 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1742.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.8 vs 3.6 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $2,859 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4640 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,291 vs 10,372).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 66.8 PassMark/$ ($2,859 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4640 v3 better than Core i3-10325?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10325 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4640 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4640 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10325 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4640 v3 comes in 1756.5% more expensive on MSRP at $2,859 MSRP versus $154 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10325 is also 1742.0% better value on MSRP (66.8 vs 3.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10325

The Core i3-10325 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,291 points. Launch price was $154.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

The Xeon E5-4640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,372 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10325 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-10325 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — a 57.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-10325 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-10325 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10325 scores 10,291 against the Xeon E5-4640 v3's 10,372 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4640 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10325 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640 v3.

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+81%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+105%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,291	10,372
Geekbench 6 Single	—	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10325 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-10325) / Yes (Xeon E5-4640 v3).

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Integrated GPU	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10325 was priced at $154, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 came in at $2859. On launch pricing ($154 vs $2859), Core i3-10325 was $2705 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10325 delivers 66.8 pts/$ vs 3.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — making the Core i3-10325 the 179.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP	$154-95%	$2859
Performance per Dollar	66.8+1756%	3.6
Release Date	2021	2015

Search Core i3-10325 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.