Core i3-10325 vs Xeon Silver 4109T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon Silver 4109T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon Silver 4109T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10325

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,291 vs 10,348).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4109T, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $154 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4109T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4109T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10325 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10325 better than Xeon Silver 4109T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4109T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10325 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4109T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10325 is the better buy right now. Core i3-10325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $154 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Silver 4109T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10325 vs Xeon Silver 4109T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10325

The Core i3-10325 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,291 points. Launch price was $154.

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10325 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4109T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4109T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-10325 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-10325 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-10325 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4109T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10325 scores 10,291 against the Xeon Silver 4109T's 10,348 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Silver 4109T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10325 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4109T.

Feature	Core i3-10325	Xeon Silver 4109T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+57%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+95%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	11 MB+38%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,291	10,348

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10325 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4109T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.