
Core i3-1115G4

Opteron 6378
Core i3-1115G4 vs Opteron 6378 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1115G4 vs Opteron 6378 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1115G4 vs Opteron 6378: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1115G4
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Opteron 6378 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,860 vs 5,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6378, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6378
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6378 better than Core i3-1115G4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1115G4 vs Opteron 6378 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4
The Core i3-1115G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,860 points. Launch price was $281.

Opteron 6378
The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1115G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6378 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6378 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Opteron 6378 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4 scores 5,860 against the Opteron 6378's 5,889 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 6378. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6378.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 16 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+24% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1180% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,860 | 5,889 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,579 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1115G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6378 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4) / not specified (Opteron 6378). The Core i3-1115G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Opteron 6378 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















