Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Xeon E3-1505L v6 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1505L v6 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,860 vs 5,882).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1505L v6, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1505L v6 better than Core i3-1115G4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505L v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1115G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1505L v6 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505L v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1505L v6 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1505L v6 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4

The Core i3-1115G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,860 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

The Xeon E3-1505L v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,882 points. Launch price was $433.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E3-1505L v6 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505L v6 — a 60.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4. The Core i3-1115G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4 scores 5,860 against the Xeon E3-1505L v6's 5,882 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1505L v6. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505L v6.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4	Xeon E3-1505L v6
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+86%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,860	5,882
Geekbench 6 Single	1,579	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4) / not specified (Xeon E3-1505L v6). The Core i3-1115G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4	Xeon E3-1505L v6
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Mainstream Laptop	—