
Core i3-1115G4

Xeon E3-1225 v5
Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1225 v5 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1225 v5 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1225 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1115G4
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Xeon E3-1225 v5 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1225 v5 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,860 vs 5,953).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1225 v5, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon E3-1225 v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1225 v5 better than Core i3-1115G4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1225 v5 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4
The Core i3-1115G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,860 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E3-1225 v5
The Xeon E3-1225 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,953 points. Launch price was $224.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1115G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v5 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E3-1225 v5 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v5 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E3-1225 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4 scores 5,860 against the Xeon E3-1225 v5's 5,953 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v5. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v5.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Xeon E3-1225 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+11% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Skylake-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 5,860 | 5,953+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,579 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1115G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Xeon E3-1225 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225 v5). The Core i3-1115G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Xeon E3-1225 v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | Core i3-1115G4 | Xeon E3-1225 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














